I also like how you included your on experience with history in order to agree with her point. The anecdotal style of the nineteenth century gave way in the s to a telegraphic style that conveyed a new tone of restraint and spurious objectivity. In fact, her tone is almost comical.
Fitzgerald believes, as she says elsewhere in this essay, that "we hope our history will not change.
I mostly think that she is addressing anyone who has ever taken a history class though. Do people of color, whose history has been underrepresented in our textbooks, take a negative view of the way that history is changing?
The books sound and look different, too. As a result of attention to reproductions of folk art, photography, and other primary materials, these contemporary texts also diverge in visual style from their predecessors.
The entire essay is about the pessimistic views of history acquired by new generations. Students are increasingly learning or should be learning the skills to make sense of the past as much as the past is revealed.
I find it interesting that she really does not maintain a clear audience throughout the essay. In current textbooks, the word "progress" has become "change," and terms like "fatherland" and "founding fathers" are not to be found.
I agree with a lot of what she is saying. She is able to be both personal and objective, an ability which really improves any writing. By not addressing a clear audience she leaves it to be more open-ended and this allows her to have a wider audience.
Always quick to avoid controversy, developers of recent history schoolbooks—for, FitzGerald notes, they are "developed," not "written"—approach history "backward or inside out, as it were, beginning with public demand and ending with the historian" p.
All this is not to say that FitzGerald finds no relief from the mediocrity underlying old and new history schoolbooks.
This failure to provide conceptual connections for historical events leads to what FitzGerald calls the "Natural Disaster" theory of history: She starts out almost lamenting the changes that have happened in history textbooks: Her tone is multifaceted, which just adds to the depth of her stance.
They and other powerful Americans are never credited with serious thinking. View freely available titles: FitzGerald likens the physical appearance of new history books to Architectural Digest or Vogue. However, I would disagree with her on the extensiveness of harm that it causes. I also agree that there is no perfectly objective way to write a textbook since we all have our biases as human beings.
She definitely was not laughing about it. Yes, like Collin said, Fitzgerald maintains both a personal and objective point of view, but the way that she writes is quite dynamic.Below is an essay on "Analyze Rewriting American History" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples.
Destiny Roberts The story “Rewriting American History” By Frances Fitzgerald is not really a revelation into the way history books have changed/5(1). History of American Football Mr. Britton/Francis PSE4UPer.
3 Friday, January 17, The sport of American football has originated from two sports, soccer and rugby, which are popular around the world. FitzGerald's subsequent volumes include America Revised, a highly critical review of history textbooks (); Cities on a Hill (); Way Out There in the Blue: Reagan, Star Wars and the End of the Cold War (), a Pulitzer finalist; "Rewriting American history", a short article in The Norton Reader; and Vietnam: Spirits of the Earth ().
FitzGerald likens the physical appearance of new history books to Architectural Digest or Vogue. What has not changed throughout all the repackagings the American past has endured in the textbooks, FitzGerald tells us, is the regrettable mediocrity inherent in the conception of these texts.
I-REWRITING AMERICAN HISTORY. By Frances FitzGerald. The New to the 's when the most dramatic rewriting occurred because for the first time left-wing groups and minorities protested the. ONWARD AND UPWARD WITH THE ARTS about American history textbooks.
In the late 60s & early70s they show a sense of uncertainty about national identity. Though views on this changed over the years they were remarkably uniform & simple. The shattering .Download